Who would win in a fight: lion, tiger, or bear?
Which beast would win in a tournament of mortal combat: the king of the jungle, a ferocious striped feline, or a godless marauding killing machine (aka bear)? In other words, who is the ultimate carnivore? In the spirit of the recent NCAA basketball tournament, let’s find out.
First up: Lion versus tiger. While some say it could go either way, a closer look reveals that it’s actually the tiger. Indeed, 1960 cage fights between lions and Siberian tigers revealed that the lion usually won. But once cruel promoters starting using Bengal tigers, the most aggressive wild feline, it was all tiger. Lions didn’t stand a chance. What’s more, tigers are usually larger and carry a bigger stick (ahem, their ginormous fangs).
Next up: Lion versus bear. 19 century Californians staged well-documented animal fights, including those between lions and bears. The result: while lions would bravely charge at grizzlies, bears would smack them to their death using giant paws as a 200 pound club. In fairness, lions weigh a lot less than bears, but so do tigers. Let’s see who’s champion in the winners bracket…
The final: Tiger versus bear. A recent simulated fight by the Discovery Channel favored the bear in a victory, saying the tiger couldn’t penetrate a bear’s hide. But Discovery used the more docile Siberian brand of tiger, not the degenerate creature of darkness that is the Bengal tiger. And in-the-wild research suggests the tiger wins after rare confrontations. For example, Russian scientists have reputedly documented accounts of wounded bears whose hides had been penetrated by the lesser Siberian tiger fangs. And tigers have been known to kill crocodiles (who have thicker hides than bears) and even adult bears in the wild, given their controlled, raptor-speed attack. So who are you gonna believe: a simulated fight or actual ones?
Overall winner: The Bengal tiger. Plus, they just look a whole lot cooler than the other two.
199 Comments
Humans win….we have rifles. Animals are so lame.
I submit Tigers.
Yeah, I thought tigers, too. They just look more dangerous altogether . . . But it was interesting to read about how you would actually come to that conclusion in a logical way!
I think bears. They have thicker hides and also have more weight.
I think that the polar bear is a lot bigger than any other bear or tiger and that still the grizzlie bear is undefeateble since you can see a asian bear that is smaller tie with a lion in a fight at the chinese zoo; if you fight a huge grizzlie bear with a tiger the size in this time will matter a lot and the strenght of the bear has no comparison; a crocodile has a huge problem when fighting a tiger because they have a big problem turning around but grizlie bears are huge, they stand tall, and they posses the heaviest paws and strenght an animal can posses when sharpened on trees, plus the polar bear is a lot heavier and bigger than the grizlie bear THE GREATEST FIGHTING MACHINE IS THE BEAR
It isn’t a contest. The polar bear would win every time. They are far stronger than any member of the cat family and lions and tigers have a very thin skull. It is not a fair fight – as proven in the gold fields of America. Just google it.
Perhaps the tiger would give the polar bear a pretty swagger and tell him to ‘forget this fighting nonsense’ and ‘come up in his jungle’ and the polar bear would be all like ‘yeah I’m up for that…’ then they’d disappear off together and have twin Polagers (like when lions and tigers get together and make Ligers). Just an idea.
I agree with Pierre. Polar Bears RULE. Hey Jim buddy – its’ biologicly impossible for a bear to mate with a tiger – there genus is totaly different! I think you need to do a bit of homework.
I think you’ll find that love conquers all Lance and that it is definitely possible. Like when a limpet and a giraffe mate… You don’t think it will work then ‘WOWZER’ it goes all radioactive
Enjoyed reading this blog. Had the same debate with my two teenage sons and their two friends in Florida earlier this year. Even asked the keepers in the theme parks but they stood up for their own animals.
Rekons Jim migh have a thing for making love with animals
Learn to spell Lance.
sonny kelging is no Lance Kepis.
learn you’re bioloy Jim
MAN
OMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN
LION WILL WIN EVERY TIME. THEY ARE BRAVER THAN OTHER TWO. AND ALSO KNOWN AS A GOOD FIGHTER
Wants to believe Khalid but isn’t sure. What do you think Sonny?
A fully grown brown bear, say 900 lbs, would have nothing to fear from either lion or tiger. The Bengal may be ferocious, but wouldnt be able to get past the 200 lb clubbing arms with 6 inches claws of the bear.
The bear could break the skull of a charging lion or tiger with one single swipe.
I think it depends on which type of bears, the lion/tiger would own the smaller bears(black bear,sloth bear and inland grizzlies) but the coastal grizzlies,kodiak and polar bear would be far too for both cats and its a close call with the tiger and the lion with the tiger winning about 5-7/10 with the lion. But the bigger bears rule.
BEAR. Case in point: Baloo beats Shere Kahn. Bear, every time.
Wonders what Sonny Kelging has to say on the matter now? Perhaps he should get some more facts from leading authority on this matter – Bisty O’Hurnahan.
the answer is 12 Sonny. ps good to see you on here after such a long time
Hi Lance you ares. I would like to dispute the answer of 12 with you but I have tried getting some more facts from Bisty and can’t find her anywhere. There is a Bitsy O’Hurnahan but no Bisty. ***.
Ps – I love you Lance Kepis
you are such a cheat. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAL SHAME you didnt’ obey my twitter and sent the wrong answer through before embarking on your cheating ways. It could have been you, me and the bunjee. FYI – Bisty makes gravy I think.
HA! Lance Kepis is **** at spelling, especially words like BUNGEE. He pulls a mean ‘guess wot number of pink things’ stunt though. Word.
FYI – The answer is always 69
WTF are you guys yappin’ about yo? Come on be seriares, this a post about tigers and fightin’ and stuff not bunGee jumping limpets and giraffes with dodgy ankles.
Just to shake things up why not chuck a Rhino into the mix? I’ve heard they can be pret-ty feisty and also protective of their loved ones’ sneakers
Yours,
Bits
tiger will kill bears and lions they even eat black and brown bears but polars would murder every body.
Thanks Bits for reminding me of what we are all doing here. Do Rhino’s eat gravy?
now that the gravy vs tigers question has been answered, lance wonders who will benefit from a wean most? Eagles or Limpets & Giraffes?
I think grizzle alone can handle both lion and tiger and he alone can weigh more than lion and tiger put together.i dont think it is any contest.grizzles single claw is enough for both of them.
What about wolves?
I actually broke a wean today so figured I might as well go for it and break it some more. I am now also thinking about the giraffe and limpet discussing gravy and wonder if this was actually prompted by the post on Smoooooth-H. HA!
While a tough and generally horrid creature the wean or ‘suckybumthing’ as it is sometimes known is good for all and will help facilitate the transformation to what is known as a magetasticfuture. FYI.
Keepin’ the fire,
Galko
tigers are kings of all beasts and can totally whip a humans ass any day people say that humans would win because of there guns but if you had a human and a tiger in a cage match who would win exactly a TIGER i rest my case.
tigers are so bad ass they can even beat the s*** out of ligers and sharks and any other kind of animal and whoever hates tigers f*** you b****es
i would say tiger will win for sure
interesting and wicked 🙂
1, There is documentary evidence of tigers ( bengal) killing Rhinos ( indian), Gaurs ( biggest wild buffaloos in world),Asian Elephants ( smaller than african ones),and Indian Salt water crocs ( biggest in the world not the relatively smaller african variety).
2, Tigers live and hunt alone.
3, In central india a santuary was chosen for lion reintroduction(asiatic abt 95% of african variety in size) purely because there are no tigers in the sourrounding jungles, it was scientifically decided that in a survival situation tigers would probably predate asiatic lions as their prides are usually smaller ( 1 male and 2-3 females).
so, tigers are real bad arse’s when compared to lions agreed.
But bears, kodiak or polar please, lets keep the contests even shall we…polar bears predate on whales and walruses for christ sake..they are so bad arse that they make other bad arses look mamas boys…and i am not from north america..the only feline possibility is a liger..now that would be a fight polar bear vs liger.
I think bear lion would be owned by both doh and bears are fat so they awsome like in kungf panda bear was the BEST HANDS DOWN
The bear! Even a grizzly of similar weight could defeat either the African lion or the Bengal tiger. Ursus arctos is the ultimate carnivore.
Bears and bulls were thrown in pits for fighting in the 19th century, with much wagering. The bulls skull were usually crushed within seconds. Then a large male lion was pitted against a grizzly. The lion bravely charged the bear but was dead inside 30 seconds. I just read this, but it does not surprise me. A full grown grizzly can decapitate a caribou with one swipe! Scary stuff!
OK- but what about pound for pound? Like a bear’s weight of fighting dogs vs a bear? Or wolverines, or badgers, or hyenas? At the end of the day, I would give the advantage to mid sized hairless monkeys with a penchant for making gadgets like sharpened sticks and high powered rifles.
Actually the grizzly bear dominates fights with polar bears … seldom do they tussle but occasionally the polar bears wanders south into the grizzly’s domain and gets roughed up … The actual pitting of wild animals against each other has been done extensively in the 1800’s and the Grizzy bear remains undefeated…
I hope Ken the giraffe is feeling better x
tiger is the best
Kobe bryant would take all them out.Laker pride.Boston and Maimi sucks
lions are the king of the beast. people won’t call them that, if they don’t kick ass. they might not be the biggest, but they are brave, strong,and are built for battles. lets think about it, they live in africa. you can’t kick ass,you die in africa
loin will when
loin will when
lion will when point blank
lion will when point blank
Will when what? I think Tyrell means Win.
Stupid ares, I hayt peepl hoo cant spel proper. Reed a dikshunary
Papa’s got q brand new bag, made out of loin cloth. the loin got beat up by a bear and then they made a bag as a soovenir for papa k out of his fur. Papa thinks man is the ultimate warrior though
tim would lose because we would throw him in with all 3 animals!!!!
definately not tim!!!
tigers would win for sure espcially against tim!!! SEE ABOVE!!
all animals would beat papa k up to!!!
I think kelle is an animal
i think u should all shut up ill beat every one up asn well as the anmals
lion would lose to tigers 90% of the time so it is no big competition. The ultimate predators would have to be the polar and/or grizzly, then tigers and so on. But not all brown bears will win in a fight with tigers as we already know tigers have been known to tangle with black and brown bears.
Tigers got the most soul so they would win
Tigers and Lions have been brought into California in the 1800’s to fight the Grizzly but had no luck at all… The Grizzly would kill the lion very quickly because the lion has no fear and rushed right in … The tiger on the other hand was much more careful in his approach but met the same fate… The people of Alaska say that when the Polar Bear rides the break away ice down into Grizzly territory that the Grizzly whips the Polar bear in nearly every encounter…
I think Garry A) shouldn’t use the second ‘R’ in his name and 2: should brush up on his animal knowledge as it is well known that when coming into contact, Polar and Grizzly bears generally tend to have a bit of a snog before gettin all rowdy with each other and also going to the toilet in the woods. Much like the giraffe and limpet.
The gettin rowdy (roddy piper) bit, not the pooping.
ps – what’s faster, a limpet with the legs of a baboon OR a giraffe with legs made of mustard.
Wonders how many Rs you have to have in your name to win in a fight. I suspect one is sufficient and therefore vote for Gary (B). Re the limpet/giraffe query, I think it would have to be the limpet with the baboon legs. Giraffes can run but they would look too hot, both literally and metaphorically with the mustard trouser and would be slowed down by people like Bitsy O’Hurnahan gettin in their way and chirpsing them. The real issue here is whether there is a cooler name than Moondogg? I could wear mustard trousers and a polo neck and still be cool.
Some big times errors with original post. First Siberian Tigers fangs every bit as big as Bengal, while fights with Brown Bear are reported to go either way, incl 12 Tigers killed and even eaten by Russian brown bear which are actually half the potential weight of the species.
Coastal Brown Bear are much larger especially in Alaska…..Bear all the way.
too bad my Spas 12 gauge pump action equipped with a grip & extended mag would kill all of them(:
thank you Black Ops.
and if that dont work i have plenty of rifles.
xDD
i think lion because they are much more powerfuler
my fart will definatley win so there.
se presipitan al descartar al leon. pero si ponemos al leon de atlas con el tigre de bengala el tamaño se reduje a minimo en cambio el tigre es mas agil y feros pero el leon es una maquina de pelea experimentado desde cachorro asi que el leon es un ribal que puede dar la sorpresa a un oso girzzly un polar no se compara
el leon es mas feros q el tigre
The Honey Badger would kill them all.
Lions would beat a bear and it could go either way with the tiger!
i wud say a tiger wud demolish both but would be no mach for chuck norris 🙂
tiger.Tigers got the most soul so they would win
To Tim up top, animals are not lame. They are better then you. I think Tigers will win. The Siberian, with fangs up to 3 inches long and 20 razor sharp claws. They also have the agility and speed. Plus, Tiger are AWESOME
What is with Chuck Noris and all. He’s not that important.
I think lion is the winner because he is braver in all animals.His manes protect with any attack on the neck.He is also known for angry activity and he never quit.
I think lion is the winner .
I think lion is the winner because tiger and bear both feel fear by lion.
I think lion is the winner because bear and tiger both feel fear by lion.
The impression on the lion face is very positive and he is very confident animal so he has more chance to win any fight.
Why are there so many ignorant comments? “The lion will win because he has a positive and confident face?” “The lion is da king of da jungle?” Look where charging in recklessly against a bear got him! I actually do have a bias towards the bear, but look at all the comments above that are longer than one line and have nothing to do with limpets and baboons, and my bias is understandable. Sure, anyone would be afraid of a lion charging right at your face, but u know what happens when u back a dog into a corner and threaten it? IT KILLS YOU. I can only see a real conflict between the tiger and the bear. Kodiak, grizzly, and polar bears are huge, but tigers are quicker (they ARE cats…) and have lots of sharp weapons, but so does a bear (maybe not quite so sharp). But it seems the 200lb cudgel of a paw has beaten tigers and lions efficiently. I agree with the bear people. But the thing about pound per pound is a good argument…
? ????? ????? ???????. ????? ??????? ??? ???? ???? ? ???? ?????? ????????, ???????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ???????. ????? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ?????????? ???????? ???? ??? ??????????? ???? ? ?????????. ?????? ??? ??? ??? ?????????, ?? ????????? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ? ??????, ???????, ????????? ? ???????.
??????????? ???? ?? ?????? ????????????? ???????????, ? ??? ??? ???????? ?????.
? ????? ????? ???????. ????? ??????? ??? ???? ???? ? ???? ?????? ????????, ???????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ???????. ????? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ????? ?????????? ???????? ???? ??? ??????????? ???? ? ?????????. ?????? ??? ??? ??? ?????????, ?? ????????? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ? ??????, ???????, ????????? ? ???????.
??????????? ???? ?? ?????? ????????????? ???????????, ? ??? ??? ???????? ?????.
You forgot to put Fedor Emelianenko on the list.
I think tiger is the winner because bear and lion both feel fear by tiger.
Quoting sources was persuasive, using “one” instead of “won” less so.
Lion is God of animals!
Siberian Tigers are actually much more deadly than a Bengal Tiger. They are about 200 lbs heavier, can run 10 mph faster, have longer canines and claws. They are also just as aggressive.
What if Lions turned into Tigers? How many Bears would it take to destroy a Tiger?
I am from Bangladesh. So I am biased to Royal bengal tiger. But my neutral view:
1. Lion is braver.
2. tiger is stronger.
3. Bear is heavier.
If fighting staged in case, bear will get some facility. But in an open area tiger/ lion can attack with their aggression and full pace. Then they will attack the bear behind it. This is their strategy. Then tiger/ lion will win the battle.
biggest and most dangerous land carnivore is the polar bear. tiger has no chance sorry. those asian bears is teddybears compared
Polar bears move slowly. They kill marine mammals such as seals or whales, because these animals get very inconvenient on the ground.
Tigers are capable of killing large preys such as Rhino, gaur, elephant, female or calf. Even an elephant calf is born, will weigh about 1 ton, or 2200lbs.
Bengal vs. Siberian: Siberian tigers kill Asiatic brown bears regularly. There are no such big bears in India. The Siberian tigers are also stronger than their Bengal cousins.
The Russians documents only the Siberian tiger facts. The Bengal tigers are not available in Russia.
Tigers can kill something 5 or 6 times their own weights.
And tigers are agile and smart fighter. I don’t think when a tiger runs into a large bear, brown or polar it would attack it head on. If you’ve seen how a tiger kills a buffalo/gaur, it would circumvent it to avoid its horns, try to get on its back and manage to kill it that way.
In “Animals Face Off”, a tiger gets killed easily by a lion, because the lion has manes to protect itself. And it also gets killed quickly by a grizzly, because the grizzly breaks the tiger’s spine.
In both cases, we don’t see the agility of the tigers, but simply head on confrontation by the tigers.
These “scientific” results are from the same lab.
But tigers kill lions easily, and the results are overwhelming. Because tigers fight smartly.
In the same token, polar bears move slowly, because they have to conserve heat, they would over heat after fighting with a fast moving tiger. And tiger’s swipes and bites are deadly enough for any bears, 2000 pounds at most?
I am not discounting large bears’ sizes or strength, they have chances to win, but at much lower success rates than that of tigers.
In fact even some human being have records beating tigers and leopards “bare handed”. But what is the probability? 1ppm or less.
The ferocious maneater Tigers of bengal(india) Rules !!!!
Who cares?
I thought a Lion would win because its the king of the jungle.But now a tiger is my favorite
haahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa
“King of the Jungle” was purely artificial.
The tiger appear on the screen are very small, and still you would not be able to see why lions are the kings. Do they appear to overhelm the tigers?
In fact the director of the film said that he’d lost a couple of lions to decent sized tigers. So to finish the film, the crew chose a much smaller one. Even so, the lions wanted a quit after a few rounds. So they used multiple lions.
And, the big lions live in open plains in Africa, not forest or jungles. Tigers do. There are one type of lions live in Gir Forest in India, these lions are smaller than their African cousins, and in much smaller prides. A couple of lionesses, and they don’t live with lions unless in mating seasons. These lions, even with two, would be hard to match a Bengal tiger. When alone, for sure it would be killed quickly by tigers if they met. That is why in India, tigers are widespread, in thousonds, while Asiatic lion, their number is well under 100. And they are confined to a small area. In natural competions it is pretty clear they would get suppressed by tigers. People in India tried to reintroduce lions to the area where there were tigers, a lion and a lioness, wear radio collars. They eventually found the lioness ran away injured, and the lion was killed and earten by a bengal tiger.
Wow… the author is either biased for tigers or a total dumb ass. Possibly both. No, the Bengal tigers didn’t defeat lions every time, it was quite the reverse actually. A rather small Nubian lion named Sultan the First (one of big cat trainer Clyde Beatty’s favorites) defeated every single Bengal tiger he was pitted against. The only record we have of a (male Bengal) tiger-(male Asiatic) lion fight happening in the wild shows the tiger losing. As for the brown bear losing to a pathetic little tiger, wow. That is just beyond stupid. The Californians that staged the lion-bear fights also pitted that same bear against both Siberian and Bengal tigers. THE BEAR STILL NEVER LOST. Also, they don’t seem to realize that bears quite often dominate tigers in disputes over kills. If the tiger runs, it lives to hunt again. If the tiger stays, the bear kills it. No, crocodile skin ISN’T thicker than bear skin. Tougher, yes, but not thicker. The tiger loses both of its fights. Yet the stupid ass that is the author gave the win to the tiger, simply because it looks cooler. The bear is the real winner here. It’s not that hard to realize that. The brown bear is the ultimate land carnivore. It will stomp a cat into the ground any time of the day, any day of the week. Strength, size, smarts, stamina and reach. These advantages are the most important things to have in a fight. They all belong to the bear. Speed won’t help you much in a fight against an animal that also has great speed and reflexes; it’s like saying a cheetah would beat a lion in a fight because it’s faster. The only way the cats’ speed would save it is if they used it to haul their sorry asses away from the bear before it crushed them.
chuck noris hahaha
lol Arctodus your an idiot tigers in russa have been known to kill brown bears since ever an have been stated they are a little of siberian tigers diets,lion was pitted with a bull an bear in mexico for a small coloseum fightshow the lion was said tearing the bears face into ground beef with his gameness of like a pitbull vs your average guard dog an shortly knocked him self out by running into a corner of a cage still the bear patruding blood didnt finish him off weeks of healing the fighting bull pitted against the grizzley savgely with his sharp horns an barbaric temper he bashed the bear into the coloseum wall an flyed him around like a rag doll dispite he was 900 pounds no bear can crush a tiger or lions head even if they stood still an with a polar bears technique of cushing ice walls still cant crush there skulls idiot
They are basically the same in power but have different ways of fighting a liger on the other hand would leave a bear in peices an has no reason to fear somthing at lower weight an size the worlds biggest liger at 1600 pounds an still growing as they are alot gentleler in nature than lions of fighting each other for dominance dosent exclude there raw power, a sanctuary witnessed a 670 pound female tiger in a bad mood attacked a 1300 pound liger latching on to his skull with a 1000 psi bite tigers have, a few seconds later the liger weighing an being 2x stronger than the tiger with out effort he got loose an with a defensive hit he bashed her with a 1-2-3 strike an flew the tiger a few feet than bolted away later that night volenteers for the sanctuary found out that the tiger had a broken jaw from the ligers very soft love taps of a defensive 1 combo flurry all in all lions an tigers already have beaten bears same with bears holding there own an winning a few depening on how much bigger an feriocity each individual one has but compared to bron an strength they are showing a liger has no comparances
And lastly it wouldnt matter to much pitted one on one anyway because in the wild lions live in prides the most a group of tigers that never left each others side was 3 brothers in china same with bears with a band of bears 2 brother an 2 sister who stayed by each other til dieng of old age.lions average 6-10 in a small pride most ever recorded in a single pride was 26 in africa so no 4 bears or 3 tigers can take on a pride of 26 lions these are facts of nature 1 on 1 is already 50/50 at best biggest vs biggest an more of 80/100 for lions an tigers pound for pound with a bear just because of lions gameness like pitbulls they have shown the most hatetred twards rival prides an single male lions diving into packs of 7 hyenas an succsefully killing matriarchs possible for tigers an bears but shown only with lions to be highly dominative by nature so either or in each others habitats lions will always retain the title KING OF THE BEAST
Hawaii prime, there’s no need to call me an idiot. I’m just stating the facts here. The grizzly bear killed the first African lion it fought even before the big audience had even finished taking their seats. A big cat has low-density bones which are designed to make them more agile. A bear has high-density bones (especially in their paws) designed for digging through frozen dirt. It is more than capable of crushing the big cat’s skull. You’ve got no proof that a bear can’t crush a lion’s skull, but I’ve got more than enough. Grizzly bears have been known to kill even American bison and Spanish bulls in this way, and their skulls are specifically designed to withstand high-force impacts. If you don’t believe me, I suggest you read the book “California Grizzly”, which states that the “great
Californian killed the African king like a cat would a rat”. The tigers and lions both looked good for the money, but the bears never lost. A healthy 1500lb coastal bear has a strike force of 1000lbs, more than enough to crush the lightweight skull of any feline. Until you can actually prove to me that a bear can’t kill a tiger or a lion in this way (which you can’t do because they’ve done so in the past) don’t bother trying to tell me that. Even in the wild, no matter how many records you’ll find of tigers killing adult male brown bears, you’ll find more records of brown bears killing adult male tigers. As for the lion’s title king of the beasts, it’s not a real king. The lion only got this title because its mane looks like a crown. It is almost the top predator of Africa (which probably helped earn it the title), but most people don’t realize that Nile crocodiles can prey on them. Yes, a lion would most likely beat a tiger, as was proven by Beatty’s lion named Sultan the First. Yes, a liger might beat a brown bear, but they’re not considered a true species (being a hybrid animal) and thus are irrelevant. No, a lion or tiger wouldn’t be likely to defeat a healthy brown bear in a face-to-face fight. Yes, the Siberian tiger does sometimes prey on brown bears (they contribute up to 1.5% of the cat’s diet), but what the sources that say so tend to leave out is that the vast majority of these bears are killed while they are hibernating. Even in their vulnerable hibernation state, adult males are generally avoided. The cautious tigers that stayed away from the male bears lived to hunt again. The ones that tried to kill adult boar grizzlies were killed once the bears woke. Natural selection at work there.
Ugh, curse my silly fingers! I meant to say “You’ve got no proof that a bear can’t crush a lion’s skull, but I’ve got more than enough THAT THEY CAN.” My bad. Lol
lol most people think that the main attributes of speed/power/size determines the whole fight seen by humans animals an other living things thats not the case at all other factors are of smarts/chance/willpower/heart/experince can beat every opposing factor humans have had 80 pound gung fu martial artist killing a 270 pound world champ weight lifter kicking him in the throat pitbulls or stafford shires who weigh 40 pounds have killed great danes an saintbernards who way 200 pounds heviar a 40 pound wolverine managed to kill a 1700 pound polar bear by latching on his neck an slashing his throat small scorpions have killed giant turanchelers when it comes to the A list predaotors like lion vs tiger or bear it will always be 50/50 chance is still one of the biggest factor being no matter how the other gets killed or loses implamenting attributes of (what ever) like emotions an reason arnt equal the fact wont change they lost so inspeculations can never be a 100% pinpoint being there are way more things that come into play as a deemable fairness of a win
Hawaii prime, I suppose you have a good point there. Wolverines are pretty nasty, but that was a captive-raised (thus inexperienced) bear that a wild wolverine killed. But let’s not forget that bears have both intelligence and experience (as they are considered the smartest land carnivores and they battle other predators to take their kills quite often). There is, however, just one thing I want you to read:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=NuUMAAAAIBAJ&sjid=BWoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3660,4412281&hl=en
This tells of something that happened in a zoo in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. An adult tiger jumped out of its pen and killed a zoo attendant. Another keeper managed to drive the tiger off the carcass of the man with a hoe, and the tiger jumped back into a pen. Unfortunately for the tiger, however, it jumped into the wrong cage. One that happened to have already been occupied by a bear. One thing that is true about carnivores is that they don’t like each other. This was shown quite well, as the bear killed the tiger instantly. These animals were both captive, so they both lacked experience. The bear won without even breaking a sweat.
I suppose we can just agree to disagree. You have your view on the subject, I have mine. I respect that. I don’t agree 100%, but it’s not my place to judge. These things always end in stalemates anyway, am I right? I’d rather just shake hands on it and be done with this.
Arctodus what are you talking about the skull it takes less than 500 psi to break any skull on earth the human skull only 15 psi so basacilly your saying a bear can break a elephants skull because of passing 500 psi it dosent work that way when animals colide say like caribu an rams rinhos ect they genarate way beyound a aligators bite 2500 psi but there heads dont blow up when shock travels threw there horns or such of plates above the skull because of muscle,fat an other factors ive seen polar bears cuddle an sit on there cubs why dont they break every bone? because there are adjusments in muscle tention even when all mass is on it just like how you can lift a alive man with ease but a dead man with dead weight feels 3x heveiar so maybe you should educate your self more on the matter an stop bringing up a one shot theory that is astrinomical an never heard of even in real live clashes with small hunting dogs subduing giant bears or 1000s of bear baiting never had an occurance where 5 dogs vs a toothless clawless bear bait result in smashing a dogs skull just mere breaking ribs an legs even bashing them into convulsions dident show breaking of the skull itself an like all bias idiots out there who are either refusing to find vice versa info an just want to belive theres is undeafeted when they already lost in the wild an pitted lol back in the day when before animal activist band cruel animal fights,pits an baitings even alot of video circulation on tape an internet were wiped from exisitince i remember tons of back in the day seeing of a farmer recording his sons cutting the feet off a bison calf then letting a huge 1200 pound grizzley have him a few seconds running to the other side an letting the 2 parents out the male bison heard the bellow of the calf with full speed smashed the grizzley on the outerrior of the rodeo wall breaking his back instantly you could tell because seconds after the full lunge an ram the bear never moved an inch from first hitting the ground after stomping his head for 2 to 3 minutes not even in cunvulsing just laying life less
Belive me i am not bias at all with bear vs lion or tiger but still to me it will always be 50/50 because one lion beating a bear cant emply that all lions beat bears an vice versa bear beating a lion wont mean all bears can beat lions bias tiger fans only love the titles of tigers beating lions but if you look deeper in the same stories they are saying with tigers in romin days it was said asiatic lions were on par with caspian an bengal tigers both winning 50/50 when the emperor pitted them in the coloseum when barbary lions fought bigger bengal tigers they lost so fast people wanted there money back so they pitted 2-4 tigers against the barbary male lions hense most stories sayng tigers won but with 1000s of art sculptures an statues in rome an greek temples as proof they show multiple tigers against a single lion same with bears ive never heard of stories beside the O famous line people use an saying a lion bull an bear where the lion rushed in blindingly an the bear made short work of him when not even 4 lions can make a short work of 1 lion an broke a fighting bulls neck with ease lmfao a fighting bull is 5x more hot tempered than your most dominate bull elk or moose an has been always known as a lion tiger bear jaguar what ever large predator you can think of killer but can not be classified as a predator or beast because it eats only vegietation ive seen vice versa of what you say twards lions an bulls from a bear an seen video cassettes of fighting bulls demolishing your biggest bear it would be pure luck if a bear could even grab let alone hold a thrashing bull by his neck an ive seen huge bears that tiped scales at 1400 pounds not being able to handle a full on 2 foot horn perice of a raming 45 mph 1900 pound bull let alone when he does wave after wave of superman diving into the bear having stamina that out matches 5 to 8 bull fighters in the ring with swords an spears stuck in his back
Archtodus again im hearing some biasness in your words lion was only king for his mane lol everything about a king roots straight to a lions lifestlye an qualities not just hair on his head that dosent even look like a crown if that so why bother putting a crown on a lion in statues art ect that stupid an implicates he has 2 crowns on his head, his traits of raising a family an protecting them from every thing trying to harm them is what a king does for a kingdom not like male bears tigers or any other beast who abandins there children an even if the mom dies males dont allow cubs to follow. A king back then rarly passed on his inheritance he in order to be dubbed king like king arther,leonitis,alexander,kahn,kamehameha they must prove them selve by being smart,loyal,strong,honorable trials of combat,knowledge of limits respecting the peoples needs an fairness of give an take to there people before even be dubbed king thats why the world knows they are king of the animal kingdom even though certain reigons favor the tiger as symbolic purposes of kind an playful yet strong an wise lion will always be king an to say a bear kills a lion like a cat kills a mouse lmfao a rat runs from a cat which a male lion guarding his family has never ran even from 4 to 7 lions or 15 to 20 hyenas in history then when confronted a rat puts up no occord or damage to a cat where if a lion seeking a dominace of owning new teritory an goes on a rage a bear better make sure he brings his A GAME when confronting him because lions have killed hippos who grow 3x bigger than the worlds biggest grizzley an a bite force that can rival a crocidiles an records still show tigers killing more bears in russia than bears kill tigers an these are in the open fields,forests,plains people wittnessed these events not in a cave or hole where bears hibernate
An you cant say ligers arnt contenders the fact they are hybrids dosent disclaim anything just like dogs there are (350 pure breeds) in the world an the akc recongnizes 700 mixed breeds in the world an some dogs have more than 5 to 7 breeds in them pushing 1000 + difernt dog breeds in the world just like how they are expanding the tigon an liger to li-liger an ti-tigon an have even sucsesfully mated two of those as well when most bullshit scientist said ligers are fertile a liger is a trumph card because pizzly an grolar bears have the rarest chances because of chromsome problems not matching an dont have any alive even in captiveity who knows in the wild?but today there are over 700 an growing of ligers an tigons rangeing from usa to korea,china,russia an so forth grizzly bears average 700 pounds biggest grew to 1600s area as adults ligers average 900 pounds biggest liger 1600s an still growing but they stated that a grizzly that size is obese an same with ligers meaning 1600 is pushing it but a lion or tiger would most likely beat a bear pound for pound but a liger is actually poping up an showing agression an dominace from the lions genes side, rocky the liger just killed a stupid ass volenteer who broke the # 1 rule of never enter the cage when they are there always feed them threw a pole when they are present I say good for him what a dumb fuck over a 100 years that sanctaury was doing fine no incedents with the RULE never go in when they are in LOL other male ligers are showing very high agression twards there inmates of lions tigers tigons an other ligers they also ruled out scientist bullshit claims of not contoring to there bigger sizes an now big cat trainers are stating ligers are even more agile an docile even better swimmers than tigers an capabilities in matching tiger an lion acrobactics with a truck driving with food has clocked him at 52 mph an moving an pulling things 4x heviar than your biggest tiger can an you cant say they are a new species in genaral when they have been spotted in history in the 1700s an before that where they co existed a few side by side locals an viligers have always have town legends of bigger cats than tigers with differnt color variations similar of ligers where they hunted an killed lions an tigers an a few ligers an tigons but we are talking about a cat that can pulverise a lion an a tiger shown just as play time when sizeing each other up as do male lions do in prides when lions an tigers already bested an killed a few bears in history again its still 50/50 bear vs lion vs tiger but ligers have now been showed in traning they have 4 x the power of your biggest an strongest male african lion an siberian tiger so respectively on size he not only passes the grizzley in size an power but the area of his head alone proves he has a harder bite than all three where tigers have a few higher than lions reaching 1286 psi I cant wait for the psi numbers from a 1400 pound liger bites down, the famous liger name hercules is how most look but his brother aka hobb is ideal of how i think a badass liger should look like in the wild nothing would stop ligers if all came out as hobb like being already he is 50/50 lion/tiger a mate of same status as hobb can only make one thing contoring to lion king of the beast is LIGERS GOD OF THE BEAST
By the way if you dont belive look up liger world .com they show scientist asumptions all downing the ligers existince of female tigers die of lack of C section when more than 90% of all ligers born the tiger mom survives an the liger cubs are no bigger than lion or tiger cubs an only 1 or 2 just hapenned to past away as every animal or human does in very rare occaisains during delivery, they said there life spam is cut in half an have heart an joint problems sanctaury an some zoos prove them wrong some ligers lived passed 20 years old same as lions an tigers an have exellent acrobatics the only ones that had joint problems were from idiot back yard breaders who had them living in small cages unable to move same shown with a few lions an tigers which leave them with there legs not growing proerly from lack of using them at all scientist said they will become confused an depressed in being raised with out parents where owners an sanctuarys said thats bullshit the tiger mom never abandons there cubs an stays by them same as regular cubs having the scent of the mothers womb an the father lion loves an grooms them occaisionally being not as needing to be ferocious in a park where they are pampered an free from compitition an finally scientist say ligers will lack the survivng skills lmfao again like pitbulls they have now inherted the fighting skills of both parents although pitbulls are created from over 5 dogs threw out time they narrow the abilitie to dish out punishment from the bull dog an high tolernace of pain from the english staffordshire an stamina from the bull terrier which makes the ultimate fighting dog same with ligers now they show ligers have a great love for the water which lions cant standfrom the tiger genes an they love to sociallize in groups like prides from the lion genes few feed live animals like big buffalo an guar because they can potentialy hurt them with there horns but have already been done with ligers an said they show signs of understanding when to make a move an also extreme power in doing so where his weight cannot be shrugged off at all because of his similar pouncing abilities like all cats have an his raw grabing an shredding power looks even more impressive an perfected ligers kill easier than there lion an tiger parents ever could
Arctodus the Idiot, it means short faced bear in Greek, that is already extinct, no wonder he favors bears, even as stupid as the short faced bear. And worst of all, he named himself after it!!! HaHaHa! He can name himself as PIIGS!!!
The short faced bear, used to live in North America, stronger than even brown bears, Arctodus’ current favorite. But that power, did not help it survive. According an episode I watched on either NatGeoWild or Animal plant, it happend because it was only a scavanger, it had long legs, but could not catch preys itself efficiently, but it has the strength to scare other carnivors away but sheer strength, not agility. That is why in his/her arguments, tiger’s agility never helped. Tigers are much stronger than lion in terms of pure strength, and agility, and bone density, and endurance, and weight, intelligence. Yet this idiot simply quoted Clyde Beatty’s who said that tigers would even lose to lioness. You can find Clyde Beatty biased opinions on AnimalFightClub.com, all stupid arguments. That a lion does not swipe as fast is because a lion/lioness wanted to save energy….
Hawaii Prime,
Please use punctuation so that you can be better understood.
but even on you tube people have been caught making up bullshit lies about there favorites like a news article with a boviously changed wording of grammer an word knowledge of a retared uneducated person stating a tiger killed a lion in a zoo an showed a bunch of docters in the photo operating on the lion when ive already seen that pic the original artical said a lions eye was injured when fighting multiple lions in his encloser an doctors were doing there best to save his eye LMFAO i mean the extent of how far a bias idiot goes is fucking halirious lions an tigers have been pitted an foght in the wild where they used to coexist an they all have the same amount of killing each other depending what subspices was used an what status that indivudual had tiger fanwhores tey to imply an gather all the historical documents an say lions lost 9 out of ten times an never seem to bring up lions killing them as well just tto show a better sight of theres is better
Hawii Prime,
I am not sure where you found those Roman facts, that they used multiple tigers against a single lion so that tigers won easily. Funny, don’t you think?
Let me tell you more, and you can look up on youtube.
A lion would have great diffculty dealing with 7 hyennas at once. He can kill the matriarch, but not 1 on 7. There are many videos, if you watch them very carefully, you’d be able to see that it is alway a pride of lions, or most members of the pride to be precisely, fighting a hyenna clan. There are other lions standing by. Without the pride, the lion would be under siege, and you know hyennas kill lions, or lionesses, sometimes.
In fact, lions kill leopards, but hardly 1 one 1. Although a lion is much bigger than a leopard, the leopard uses its claws to scratch the face of the lion. Most of the time, the lion would not want to continue the fight as the leopard forelimps are fast and the claws are very sharp, and the leopard would find a chance to retreat. I have seen a video clip, a leopard jumped off a tree and started a fight with a single male lion.
When facing multiple lions, a leopard may be able to flee, if it is lucky. But when there is a male lion leading the attck, the leopards life would be in great jeopardy, and the chances that it gets killed is very high, or severely injured and dies of infection even if it escapes successfully.
When facing a tiger, the lion’s difficulty would be a lot more than facing a leopard. Tigers claws are fast and sharp, and they are more powerful. And tigers can maneuver very fast thanks to their much stronger hind legs, and their forlimps are even more impresive. In terms of pure strength, agility, muscle and bone densities, sizes, weight, tigers are clearly superior than the strongest lions. In fact, a lion is only capable to match a tiger half its weight(South China tigers). As the tiger get bigger, the time it takes for the tiger to kill the lion gets shorter, in minutes. When confronting the bigger tigers, Bengal or Amur/Siberian/Northeast China tigers, the lion would find itself defenseless. In terms of boxing, wresting, biting, maneuvering, endurance, tactical skills, intelligence, a lion would not be able to find any edge. Its mane offers some help, but not significant enough to save its life.
In an open area a smallest tiger would be able to hold off multiple lions.
What I found was, in Roman times, they used 4 tigers/tigeresses against 5 male lions. I have never heard anybody mentions using lionesses. It is just too obvious.
At Six Flags Discovery Kingdom there are many tigers, and a lion couple. These lions are not impressive at all. And the visitors hardly cast their eyes on them. They look skinny. I am not sure anybody would think that they can beat those big tigers. The zookeepers speak highly of the tigers, and they are the main attraction for the zoo.
There are modern video clips on youtube.com, that you can see yourself with your own eyes. A tiger can hold off multiple lions, but not the other way around. If two tiger want to fight a single lion, basically the lion is defenseless. I am not sure how you got your story the other way around.
For these reasons tigers are now favorite animals in US, followed by dogs. Don’t you think it is hard to beat dogs this way, given dogs’ intimate relationship with people in America?
So it is not my personal opinion that tigers are stronger than lions, but a common sense. Watch those video clips and draw your own conclusion.
the only things bear whores say is bears can over power lions an tigers an somehow think that there throats are made of steel, fights in between cant be easily caculated on just that humans that fight have been more than ten minutes an some knockouts only a few seconds so its the same with lions,tigers an bears a lion or tiger can fight a bear ten minutes or kill him with a bite or slash to the neck instantly its all chance power aint that far away because tigers have been known to kill teen elephants that have 5x the power of any bear an lions have killed hippos that have triple the power bears have in brute force wise 1000s of hunters have seen cougars pumas an leopards who weigh half of tigers an lions have killed bears 6 x there size in the past by using peer intelligence an speed the same way a mongoose does to a cobra bears aint smarter in combat for they only use a brute force tactics tigers an lions have outsmarted one hit shoters already like crocodilies head to head who genarate above 2500-5000 psi an have takken an survived a few 1 or 2 bites from them so a bear bite or paul swipe wont do as much damage as you think a bear would be to arogant an take on a big croc thinking he can take all his bites but will prove more than a few with death rows can easily rip of any limb he has leaving him to bleed to death
I don’t think I am biased. In fact in my first post on this website, I mentioned that even humans have the chance to kill tigers/leopard “bare handed”. But who wants to face a tiger or leopard bare handed? What is the chance of surviving such a confrontation? I have heard only two case, and in one, the man won not completely bare handed. He used a wood stick and hit the tiger in the head, very heavily first. The wood stick broke, and he was left without any weapons and then used his bare fists only.
OK, the bears have better chance beating a big cat, given their thick furs/hides. Better than 50%? I doubt it. The bear is big and powerful but in the mean time its stupid, and clumsy. It may have a better chance against a lion than a tiger, but according to a video clip I found on youtube.com, a lioness keeps scratching a bear in the face, and the bear could not find any way to counter the attack, other than moving away.
Just imaging a fighter plane, small but agile vs a big clumsy cargo plane or any other planes that are bigger. If the cargo plane bumps into the fighter plane, who wins? It is obvious. But is the fight pilot stupid enough to let this happen? Hardly. Which one have an edge in a fight? The answer is too obvious. Or it is not a fighter plane.
So it the Bears vs. Tigers or Lions, please do not ignore that fact that big cats have an overall advantage over bears when combines multiple factors strength, sizes, weight and agililty. Only those dumb asses would think that a tiger would want to let a bear smash itself in the face. Such as “Animal Face Off”. Actually I think those people in the lab are dumber than the cats.
There is a video of a cougar vs a bear. The couger stood by the side of the bear and tried to bite the bears or other parts of the bear. The bear retreated as the cougar wanted to protect her kitten. The mother prevailed.
In another case, a bear tried to intimidate a cougar by standing up very tall and pouncing the ground. It is very scary scenario for a much smaller cougar facing a giant bear. But the bear can not catch the cougar.
Given the prudence of the tigers, how would it fight a bear? Let it smash or pounce to death? It could happpen. What is the chance for that to happen? Just use your imagination.
agility too. Weight and raw forces without agility would not be decisive in a baCrocdiles may weigh over 1500 pounds, and their bite forces are much bigger than any mammals, except perhaps that of a hippo. Only dinosaurs have stronger bite forces.
But there are many videos of cros vs tigers on youtube.com. Who won? Search and find your own answers.
I can’t find any video of tigers vs grizzely anywhere. I believe it is illegal to pit them and let them fight to the death. So I came up with this comparison. Of course bears move better than crocs, but the crocs have comparable weight and stronger bites. So those people think bears can defeat big cats, because they weigh 1500 pounds, please consider ttle.
Sorry I’d have to repost.
Crocdiles may weigh over 1500 pounds, and their bite forces are much bigger than any mammals, except perhaps that of a hippo. Only dinosaurs have stronger bite forces.
But there are many videos of cros vs tigers on youtube.com. Who won? Search and find your own answers.
I can’t find any video of tigers vs grizzely anywhere. I believe it is illegal to pit them and let them fight to the death. So I came up with this comparison. Of course bears move better than crocs, but the crocs have comparable weight and stronger bites. So those people think bears can defeat big cats, because they weigh 1500 pounds, please consider agility too. Weight and raw forces without agility would not be decisive in a battle.
Hawaii Prime,
I don’t think that is your real name, but very likely you live in Hawaii.
It is very clear you live in a fantasy world. You always stay on the opposite side of facts, video clips. Your can claim the whole world is delusional, only to show that you are just a lunatic, poorly educated, judging you by the way you write, the name calling style of arguements, your don’t sound like a normal person. Your thoughts are not clear, and when write, it shows that you can’t write as an educated person would.
It is not you claim yourself above average. It is how you behave that matters.
Well, you have some minor improvements in your writing style in the last few posts.
Wake up.
Y
Hawaii Prime,
I don’t think that is your real name, but probably you live in Hawaii.
It is very clear you live in a fantasy world. You always stay on the opposite side of facts, video clips. Your may claim the whole world is delusional, only to show that you are just a lunatic, poorly educated, judging you by the way you write, the name calling style of arguements, your don’t sound like a normal person. Your thoughts are not clear, and when write, it shows that you can’t write as an educated person would.
It is not you claim yourself above average. It is how you behave that matters.
Well, you have some minor improvements in your writing style in the last few posts.
Wake up and visit Six Flags in California. If you’re there and keep talking the way you do, guess what, 100% of the people would think you’re mentally ill.
after analysing all comments here..winning is just a matter of chance..tiger, lion or bear..any of them can be a winner..but bigger chance is that a bear would win..strong bones (it eats a lotta fish) n weight favors it!..one thing i’m sure off a guerilla take them both..because i’ve seen with my own eyes a lion being beat up by two baboons who are smaller n less powerful than guerilas..im from serengeti by the way!
i bet it would be grizzlies, i just read a fact that lions dont even stand a chance against polars, how much more if it would be grizzlies same goes to tigers bengal or what, little difference… i dont mean to step on to anyones opinion though =O
it would be a tiger they are very strong i dont evan know why they call the lion the king of the jungle and if your reading this please donate to save the tiger habitat there my favorite animal ever:)
I like Lions, I’ve started being more fascinated when going into my fathers room to eat a chicken finger, then being distracted by The Nat Geo WILD Channel 😀 I saw Lioness, Lions, and Cubs running across dry land. And i stayed in there for HOURS being hypnotized by the power of a Lioness named “DuClaw” who was struck in the head by prey. So today, i turned to the Nat Geo WILD channel and saw Tigers, since of course, its “BIG Cat Week”. And i thought to myself, “Who would win, a Lion or a Tiger”. Although i claim that a tiger would win since its the King of the jungle and more fierce, i suppose it would be a TIGER, because many people are saying Tigers would win, because of the cage fights that were hosted many years back. So I was on my laptop today supposedly doing homework when i looked up my mysterious question and stumbled across this lame dull site :] ~JiqquhNumbuh1 P.S:I just read this back to myself, and i never knew that i could sound so intelligent.! 😀
BENGAL TIGERS(INDIAN TIGERS) will definitely win coz first of all, all of u sayin polar bears being stronger so they’ll win is ridiculous coz they are lazy and do not have quick reflexes and speed as that of tigers….
A bengal tiger is larger than a lion and look at those freakin teeths…
A polar bear or lion might have a chance with siberian or other tigers but, bengal tigers are monstrous.
and lets face it they are more beautiful than lion or bears…..
TIGER IS THE MOST MAJESTIC ANIMAL IN THE BIG CAT GROUP
How would a tiger win? Bears weigh more, their bigger, and their stronger. Lion and bear I could see the bear win 7 out of 10. And lion tiger I could see a tiger win 6 of 10. So how is it possible to just say a tiger wins?
The major difference between polar bears and tigers is agility. Although bears are big, they can’t move around fast enough than any cats, big or small.
I watched a TV series by Animal planet, probably Planet Earth episodes, in one of them, a polar bear tries to catch a walrus, which perches with hundreds of other walruses. A walrus weighs over 1 ton, much heavier than a bear, plus it has powerful weapons which are its long tusks, a little bit like those of elephants. But it is a marine mammal, and its movement on land is very clumsy, so the polar bear has an advantage over it, and the bear attacks from behind, avoiding the sharp tusks. But the bears canine teeth are not long nor powerful enough to penetrate the thick hide of the walrus, which drags the bear into the water. Although polar bears are fairly good swimmers, they can’t compare with true marine mammals like walrus or seals once under water, in terms of agility. Then the attacker gets attacked, the walrus stabs the bear in the pelvis area. The bear gets out of the water unable to walk. It lies down in the center of the walruses, and according to the narrator of the TV series, it will not survive.
You can see in the case above, the determining factor is not always the sizes of the animals, but agility.
There is no comparison of the agility between big cats and bears. Especially tigers, which even has an advantage over lions. Although the biggest among all cats, their agility has not reduced a bit compared with smaller cats such as leopards, excluding tree climbing. It actually climbs pretty fast but due to its weight, it would not be able to find tree branches to support itself from breaking.
The bears can hardly land a hit on cats. Bears pouncing is mostly towards steady objects such as ice surface. I have not seen many big bear vs. tiger fight. I have seen only one lioness vs. a black bear, and the lioness uses her front claws, and the bear can’t do anything other than retreating. Tigers use their front claws to inflict damages to their opponents even better, and even lions/lionesses can’t fend off such fast attacks from tigers, or even this kind of attack from leopards. I have seen a grizzly vs. mother cougar confrontation, and the cougar attacks from the side of the bear. It intimidates the cat but not able to touch it at all.
And tigers kill much bigger animals than any bears, such as gaurs in India, weighing about 1500kilos, polar bears weigh less than 1000kilos, 40% of which is fat. In appearance, gaurs may gore tigers to death, but this hardly happens.
That is why among all carnivores, tigers rank No. 1, according to a ranking provided by Animal Plant. Actually they rank No. 2 after humans with weapons.
As of lions vs. bears, I am not sure. Lions’ attacking style is quite straightforward, not as shrewd as tigers, they may have difficulty against big bears.
Siberia tigers vs Bengal ones.
Bengal tigers are notably fierce, they are very belligerent, probably due to the hard climate they live in, they are slightly smaller than their Siberian cousins. And less powerful.
Siberian tigers are true kings of cats, but they grow up in cold weather, so unless for the reasons such as territorial disputes or food competition it is less willing to fight. For the ones in zoos, they are well fed, and they can even make friends with hundreds of other animals, lions, leopards, even with dogs.
There is a clip of Siberian vs. Bengal tigers fight. the Bengal picked the fight, although unable to fight effectively with the Siberian(Amur), it kept on, and looked quite awkward. But it did not give up nor give in, until the Siberian became quite impatient and threatened to kill, and the clip ends there.
Use “Amur Bengal tiger” key words on Youtube.com you’d be able to see it yourself.
I think bascially a lion could win. Cause a Male Lion can take down a hippo cause If a lion charges at a hippo the hippo will walk with the lion on it’s back. While the lion is sticking it’s teeth into the hippo is back. Also if the hippo’s gets a chance too run into the water of course the hippo is only lucky, but if the lion’s teeth hit the spine of the hippo. The hippo would be completely defenceless, and also would be eaten.
LION SHOULD WIN LOOK AT THIS LINK.
Igers would beeat the lion and bear without even trying!
Polar bear would win….
between a lion and a tiger lion should win. they are more stronger and more skilled then tigers.plus their mane makes the win.even a Siberian tiger should lose against a lion. even if the tiger is bigger lion is stronger. why do you think they sleep 20 hours a day? to charge their tremendous strength. i see videos of tiger beating the lion in Asia.lions there are smaller and weaker. African male lions are the apex predator of the world.they hunt giraffes buffalo and a fuckin elephant if they are desperate . lone males are the most dangerous one . they will hunt humans too.a bear is no match for both lions and tigers. tigers kill adult bears in Russia.a polar bear is gone be different story but there is no way to proof that. look all these animals can kill a human in one smack. some say polar bears win. can polar bears kill an elephant? no chance. in cage fighting lions are the winners that’s why i thing they will beat tigers.
there is a reason lion is the king f the bests
did you know that prehistoric american lions where the strongest mammal predators that ever lived.0.5 times bigger than an African lion.even bigger then a liger.
hawaii prime=world’s number one dumbass/lion freak.
author=world’s number one dumbass/tiger freak.
Arctodus=one of the few people with a bit of common sense. Anybody who thinks a lion or tiger could ever beat a brown bear, grow a few brain cells, would ya?
Lion is stronger than tiger. Lion will lose to bear.
lion will never loose to a bear. i have facts and opinions.they say that Siberian tigers kill adult brown bears. they weight 500 kg. the same as grizzly. lion is stronger than tiger so he beats bear too. don’t be shocked . have you ever heard in history about cage fighting . lions killed bear , tigers and even humans with swords and spears. the bear is bigger but not as agile as lion
Bullshit. The Lion will maul apart any tiger – Siberian or Bengal. As for the poor bear, it will end up as supper for the whole pride.
The Grizzly would win easily. A typical male lion in the wild will weigh in between? 400 and 600 pounds. Wild male grizzly can top out near 1,500 pounds, and captive grizzlies can weigh well over a ton. Even tigers top out at less than half the weight of a grizzly. Lions are known as pure predators and grizzly as omnivores, but grizzly have been documented hunting and killing deer, elk, moose, cattle, bulls and buffalo. The grizzlie also lifts big bolders for food.
Lastly the tremendous shoulder strength of the grizzly allows it to crush the skulls and spines of its prey with swipes of its claws. The lion? might be the alpha predator of Africa, but it is totally outclassed by the Grizzly.
lion
To all you Lion n Tiger lovers…didnt you guys watch the “Jungle Book” as kids??? I think I remember Baloo handing Shere Kahn’s ass to him in a brown paper bag. Sorry all you tiger n lion humpers, lol grizzly/polar all the way! Its common sense kids……
every one who says sun bear your right if you dissagree you can say your gay ass
YOU ARE ALL RETARDS!
YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS!
A HONEY BADGER WOULD WIN EASILY, FREAKING IDIOTS, HONEY BAGDER ALWAYS WINS!
they win my balls
I give it a 60/40 lion in a pit fight or man made intervention 1 on 1. But although there are nomadic males that get booted from there pride or parents die an have to search for making a new one, but meeting that way in the wild is still astrinomical because lions live in prides, tigers would get mauled in every incounter, beause lions are 80% of the time in prides. Being they are in more ways identical then they are not, with no bias in there its already 50/50 if at the same age, sex an weight by minor fractions. 1 on 1 again if a tiger some how met a lion an scraped, only in a few seconds the whole pride would hear the comotion and simply maul the tiger, leaving the tiger in peices in seconds.
–
Thats why they arnt in the same places like in africa, only russia an asia and with asian’s pretty much eradicating asiatic lions to almost extinction, gave there symbol of power the tiger a better chance of survival. But there are a group of tigers in africa that were inported there as for sanctuary purposes, but they are on a 500 acher privatly own land, that is enclosed at all corners with high fences. So the tigers arnt really in the wild, yet though they would stand even less chance now, being the asiatic lion has beatin the bengal tiger in several occaisians, he is with the asiatic lions cousin now, the african lion who is almost 2x bigger an better fighters with larger prides. Comming to the conclusion, that all other solo cats in africa, live by the golden rule, that if confronted by a male lion they run thats how they survived so long along side with lions. But a tiger isint really afriad an is a proud animal so he’d fight but that would be his down fall being that there are rarly lone males, they are averagly 2 but brothers have been shown as great as 8 never leaving each others side even as adults and its not like the tiger can speak lion an ask for a 1 on 1 because 1 on 1 is a human concept, the tiger would get shred apart.
–
But they both have killed each other already, with accounts on both sides but seeing so many crazed tiger fans hear, thinking its impossible for lions, here are a few accounts of lions killing tigers 1 on 1.
–
1.Gieniuss books/Animal facts, Lion named Nero killed Tim the tiger in an australian zoo.(Documantry)
2.1936 Agartala zoo in bengal, a lion kills a tiger.(Local news report)
3.1935 Sikestonians saw a lion kill a tiger in a local town circus act.(Documentry)
4.1934 2 tigers died, In the movie devil tiger from a lion-(Video)
5.1955 oct, 6 Natrual history society, Page 465-468, 3 seperate accounts lion won all 3.(Documentry)
6.1960 Korea pitfights Male lions won majority of all fights.( Hidden news Report)
7.1981 Martin. L Albert witnessed a lion kill a tiger.(Documentry)
8.1954 Lion kills tiger with one blow in boltimore zoo.(Documantry)
9.1935 In the town Bedford masachusetts a Zoo lost a tiger to a lion.(Local news)
10.Gir foreset 3 tigers vs 3 lions, all lions won. (Video) -Youtube-
11.2011 Korea two teen lions killed a adult Bengal tiger in an encloser.(Video)- Youtube-
lion will win over tiger and bear,long live my pride lion
I had been watching a fight between a lion and a tiger…lion wins the fight.In a fight,size is not the necessary to win,there are five required points to win in the fight 1)active 2)bold 3)determination 4)courage 5)confidence and all these required points are posses by a lion.So lion will always win in a fight
Lion stand a chance against tigers I believe ligers do too… But bears mite over power them……. How any of them put in the pool with a shark they would all look be wiped out
I think if you research and read enough you will realize the Brown Bear in General Grizzy, Kodiak and their ancestors have always been the Dominant Predator. Unlike cats they have thick Skulls and are incredibly strong. Aside from a Grizzy can Outsprint a Horse, how is that for speed and explosiveness?
Royal Bengal Tiger always wins!
They survive through mud area and human! What they are they are Perfect survivor on Earth
To Tim,
–
Brown bears have bigger bone’s to supoort there weight, but by all mean’s they are not densar. Scientist have study’ed the bone density ratio’s of alaskan brown bears, having 1.27 density in there front limbs an african lions also having 1.27 as well. But there marrow in lions bone’s are less, thus giving them stronger outer walls for more acrobatical speed without putting strain on there joints an without losing output power, not one way motion speed and any way, lions are still way faster than bears in pure speed an agilty, even in one way motion. If your only thinking that power an size are the only factors for brown bears, your way off track, for there were accounts of male lions killing adult polar bears in circus’es. Who out weigh brown bears averagly by 500 pounds an can grow as big as in the 2,000 pound range, also being a few feet taller in height. Here’s the accounts in where an when they happend…
–
.“My Life with the Big Cats,” was written by animal trainer Alfred Court, who was a headline attraction with Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey. Published in 1955
–
“Louis Roth . . . Forty Years with Jungle Killers,” was written by Dave Robeson in 1941.
–
In those books are mentioed circus accidents of the two top predators clashing, there are a few others, like John helliot who has owned both animals, an have had a Polar bear killed by a lion in his acts.
–
To your thinking in past events bears were the top predators is bullshit. Bears were always classed omnivores, so they didnt need to kill as much as lions needed an beside’s making like they always won, which you would have no alibing resorce to back that up, but I do. Here it is…
–
But it is the battles these bears fought with the equally impressive cave lions that is perhaps the most intriguing. Three skeletons of cave lions have been found so far 800m deep within Romania’s Ursilor cave.These remains overlap with the cave bear’s territory, suggesting the lions had entered to hunt and kill bears.
Another cave, known as the Zoolithen cave near Burggeilenreuth, Germany has yielded a far more impressive hoard, however.
Dr Diedrich has researched the remains of 13 cave lions found in Zoolithen.
–
There you have it, beside’s lions have already killed any an every type of bear speices in 1 vs 1 thrw out history, It is well known that they use tactical means of Unity, threw there pride’s. Bear’s are solitary so 80% of the time just 2 lions would have a 80% succses rate of killing an oposing bear. There is no if ans or buts if the pride…
(12 Adult lions) laid eye’s on the bear an decided to persue it, then the bear has no other choice but to run or die fighting. Also it was stated in a book of memoirs of cleopatra, of the roman arenas that brown bears from across the world were used as well, with it still stating that lions were the campions of the arena, meaning lions killed bears more the other way around.
–
–
–
To Mohit,
–
The gir video fight, was of 3 asiatic lions vs 3 bengal tigers an all asiatic lions won. Same with Jan sahib a Indian zooligist, who documented 4 seperate fights of lions vs tigers an Royal bengal’s lost all. Even in jeonju zoo in 2008 Hobb the siberian tiger persued Cheongi the lion for a chicken that was thrown to feed the lion, the nomadic lion killed the 50 pound hevier tiger in mere seconds, before the owners an workers had even enough time to shoot them with a high power water hose or tranq gun, Cheongi grabed Hobi by the throat an shaked veciously an just like that it was over.
All tiger fans and polar bear fans:- (bloody fuckers and asses), the lion is always the emperor of the jungle. No bloody bastard has any right to comment about the invincible powerful relentless lion!!!
I think tiger cause ive acually seen a tiger beat nearly every animal even a human in a tank packed with rifles and guns
Why do they have to fight? Can’t they all just get along?
?? ??? ?? ??? ????? ??? ??? ? ??? ?? ?? ??? ? ?? ?? ??? ??? ???
?? ??? ?? ??? ????? ??? ??? ? ??? ?? ?? ??? ? ?? ?? ??? ??? ???
Here’s some more account’s, that lion’s have killed tiger’s 1 on 1.
–
12 King Edward the lion kill?s Dan the tiger. (Book)
13.Calcutta zooligical garden?s a lioness kills a tiger(New?s article)
14.Gambier bulton, brittish mengerine saw a lioness kill a tiger.(New?s article)
15.1925 Rudolf kludsky had several lions had killed his tiger?s.
16. M. Herbert?s mengerine lion kills royal bengal tiger. (New?s article)
17.1970 pittsburgh Press lion kill?s tiger in india.(Video)
18. Mr F.c owner of bowstock had a lion kill a tiger before his act.(New?s article)
19.1949 in fitchburg a lion kill?s a tiger in circus act.(New?s article)
20 1851, In the ?Landshuter Zeitung? a lion killed a tiger.(German new?s atricle)
–
I guess who ever wrote the wiki on lion vs tiger’s, was a Bia’s tiger fanatic an lion hater, like how he state’s no lion has ever killed a tiger in history XD. Yeah, right! Clyde beatty the world’s famous animal tamer an circus performer stated in a new’s report, he lost 4 lion’s that was killed by his tiger’s an he lost around 50 tiger’s that were killed by his lion’s, Those number’s would mean that a lion would win 9/10 time’s in every encounter.
lion is winner
Tiger’s Roar…
–
http://inchinapinch.com/hab_pgs/terres/coniferous/images/tiger_roar.mp3
–
Lion’s Roar…
–
http://www.tunghai74.org/forums/movie/MGM-Lion-Roar.mp3
–
Hmmmm… You be the judge???
i am serios
Tiger will win…
Here?s a few documented artifact?s an sculpture?s that are in
museum?s, portraying the lion winning against the tiger, why? Because
apperntly they would have to have seen the incident, to etch it or
sculpture it an these are from different people from Rome, to India,
to Britain, to China all portraying the same thing the lion having the
winning.
–
1. http://www.grosvenorprints.com/jpegs/1148.jpg
2. http://www.grosvenorprints.com/jpegs/6445.jpg
3. http://lh4.ggpht.com/_LlfXWxcpJyU/S90EuAIm5pI/AAAAAAAAelY/-5Dy65n0ChI/Fullscreen%20capture%2002052010%20054713.bmp_thumb%5B3%5D.jpg
4. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-b-1ewj–8-U/TcldVkFC2RI/AAAAAAAACrk/4pK2eeykqrE/s1600/The+British+Lion%25E2%2580%2599s+Vengeance+on+the+Bengal+Tiger.jpg
5. http://www.monstermedals.com/ekmps/shops/monstermedals/images/seringapatam-medal-1799-bronze-426-p.jpg
Here’s more…
Saying Tigers win is ridiculous. Yes I have no doubt there will situations in the wild where a Tiger was able to beat a bear BUT that is only due to a Tiger being able to sneak up and totally blind side a bear that was minding its own business. I’m sure I can sneak up on a professional fighter and stab them in the back without them having a chance… that in no way means I’m a better fighter than them.
I see most people are miss led by weight factor’s, it’s just known on average tiger’s get slightly bigger than lion’s, not individual wise, there’s a difference.
–
If a test census, aqurie’s 10 random tiger’s an 10 random lion’s at around the same age from the wild,an 7/10 lion’s are 500 exact an 8/10 tiger’s are 500 exact, that would imply that tiger’s averagely get bigger, it dosent mean tiger’s will be bigger everytime.
–
They vary from different reigon’s all over there home land’s…Here’s one of many reserve’s who house “Siberian tiger’s” weight’s…
http://i713.photobucket.com/albums/ww131/schamah/Average%20weight%20of%20Lions%20and%20Tigers/SiberianCloseto400.jpg
–
You see, tiger’s get no bigger than lion’s, beside’s a Bia’s tiger fanatic wrote wiki’s bio an state’s no tiger has ever in history killed a lion an I showed over 30 clean account’s an around 80 so far all together can bring a few 100’s which there’s ton’s more. Wiki, indragit an jackjacksonj site’s are all feeding Bia’s data which all look’s like alot, if you read closly the 367 so call account’s are only 30 all together, most are faked account’s, repeat’s an opinion’s like jackjacksonj’s account 4 is copyed from his account 352 an account 88, which 60 account’s were lied on, an 80% of the real account’s are of male tiger’s killing female lion’s, an they show data that more favor’s the tiger, when they say no lion can get as big as a tiger is “Bia’s talk”, there’s ton’s here’s a few…
–
700 pound lion
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://blogs.ublabs.org/crittercorner/files/2010/03/Lion-Dentistry_Stew2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://blogs.ublabs.org/crittercorner/2010/03/11/root-canal-performed-on-lion/&usg=__Ythw0lYaTTXL0CNkXTlNRosZMJE=&h=398&w=600&sz=245&hl=en&start=17&sig2=M3DVQWAvpVrCpou4MXJhUA&zoom=1&tbnid=r67Z5V8sGSUxQM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=135&ei=DneLT7KVGcnRiALAnbn6Cw&prev=/search%3Fq%3D700%2Bmale%2Blion%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DN%26rlz%3D1G1GGLQ_ENUS428%26tbm%3Disch&um=1&itbs=1
–
800 pound lion fight’s off 2 tiger’s
http://newspaperarchive.com/oakland-tribune/1959-03-27/
–
800 pound lion
http://junglephotos.com/africa/afanimals/mammals/lionnathist.shtml
–
800 pound lion named mubasa
http://www.kansastravel.org/britspaughzoo.htm
http://www.thirdage.com/humor/800-pound-lion-receives-root-canal-video
–
825 pound lion
http://i1017.photobucket.com/albums/af291/KingOfEurope/45yedsdy.jpg?t=1306200659
–
The tiger’s that reach the 600-700 pound range’s if you do some real research an not be gulible to the first thing you see, you’ll find that male siberian tiger’s stay around the 450-550 at best, an they rarly ever do climb to the 600-700 range’s it’s almost a 1 in a 10,000 cahnce that they will be above 600 pound’s an 1 in about a 100,000 chance they will be in the 800’s, that’s pretty rare, but dont just take my word for it, do some research on your own an get your information directly who houses them, not false properganda’s that dont even weigh them.
–
You see, there’s many if you care to do your own research, an not be pawn’s an sheep to there insanly obvious lie’s, the truth alway’s surface’s so rise above it.
Document’s of lion’s killing polar bear an grizzley bear’s…
–
http://shaggygod.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=felidaeannex&action=display&thread=798&page=3
–
1.1902 lion named roosevlet killed peary the polar bear.
2.John heliot’s circus lion named brutus kills polar bear.
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c172/ScottBanks/lionkillspolarbear.jpg
3. lion kills polar bear 1955 By Alfred Court.Pages 131-132,
4. lion kills polar bear Louis Roth, forty years with jungle killers book, page 204-205.
5.1893 Pezon in limoges, Leo the lion kills polar bear in mengerine.
6.Boltimore the lion kills russian grizzley
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/265/sdffti0.jpg/
7. Lion stale mate’s enormous grizzley bear
THE OAKLAND TRIBUNE APRIL 1, 1895 “A DRAW” PARNELL FIGHTS A BIG BEAR.
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES APRIL 2, 1895 “BRUIN THROWS LEO
8. Lion kills bruin the grizzly bear
http://www.pictures-of-cats.org/images/lion-vs-bear.gif
–
–
–
–
–
So according so far, the ranking of who’s the superior animal in “combat” are…
–
1st place…”The King of the beast, the Lion”
2nd place… “The lord of the beast, the Bear”
3rd place… “The warrior of the beast, the Tiger
–
–
–
So far, there’s more account’s of lion’s killing grizzley an polar bear’s than vice versa, there’s more account’s of lion’s killing tiger’s, there’s more account’s of bear’s killing tiger’s, which gave the ranking an title of “King” to the lion, who truely earned his name the King of the jungle…King of the animal kingdom…King of the Beast. Threw look’s an action’s, he resemble’s the word an title “King”, beyound any other animal. who has taken on bear’s 3-4 time’s his own size, with “superior” fighting abilitie’s an dominating attribute’s, took on a slighly bigger cat the tiger, who is alibied to be more agile an have a slight weight margin, an still came out victory’es. These feat’s an accomplishment’s have all been obtained with a single male lion, shown time an time again an again, that a single male lion can an has already conquered the valley of the beast, soley an rightously has somthing most beast dosent have in the wild, what is it??? A Kingdom! Lion’s rule over there pride’s as do King’s do there Kingdom’s, to where the biggest pride of lion’s ever recorded was 9 male’s an 24 female’s in a single pride, implementing, at lion’s full potential set by mother nature, without man interveening… lion’s would dominate any an every animal on any peice of land on earth.
Bear’s should b the *King of the jungle* & no looks good de r feroucious
Tiger’s wooo !!!! & Lion’s still rule !| High5 fr POLAR bears
Udyr wins
Whats up with this moderating it show’s my post are being moderated for a week already???
I wonder if these can work…
[IMG]http://www.grosvenorprints.com/jpegs/1148.jpg[/IMG]
awww guess not
they wont fight.instead become friends……
Ummmmmmm really that isn’t even a fair fight . Duh the bear would win there’s a reason why we never even fucking hunt those things, we hunt lions like they’re fucking dogs we shoot a bear he just gets pissed shoot him again he’s even more pissed , a lion can be shot down with a well placed bullet , I am scared to hunt a bear but a lion I’m still scared but I know I have a fighting chance with my rifle with a bear I won’t even attempt to shoot him I’d rather coward and hide. a bear is much more intimidating.
call an elephant
To Silver,
You seemed to have listed many “facts”, But in facts they are twisted by lion fans and rebroadcast again and again. Like what you said, two lion cubs killed and adult Bengal tiger in Korea, it is totally falsified. I watched the video. In the whole video, I never saw there was a fight, I could not see how big the tiger was, it was lying down all the time. I only saw the lions “cubs” They are not quite cubs, they were at least sub-adults.
It did not happen in Korea, It was in China.
In Chinese zoos, there are hardly any Bengal tigers, mostly South China tigers, soon to be gone algather, because of in-breeding for over half a century, from half a dozen tigers( that is only 3 pairs roughly).
Unless an effort to cross-breed them with other sub species, there is no other way to revive them as a group. i.e., many of them suffer illness. In “Rewilding South China Tigers”, a tiger, although it demonstrated incredible ability hunting in S. Africa, it died of heart attack by itself…
I have noticed that lion fanatics are the worst breed of mankind. These people are notorious liars, as you can see on youtube.com website. These are the one that spread rumor repeatedly, just like you.
You need to learn the simpliest fact: tigers and lions are different animals, and tigers are born to be the strongest cats, pound for pound. This is the fundamental reason that tigers are more agile. It is not hard to find out which cat is strong in muscle strength, just compare how they jump, run, climb, …
Because of this, in a fair fight, a lion stands little chance against a healthy adult tiger, even a tigress. Simple as that. As of lioness? Never bother to mention them. I doubt they can beat jaguars.
Tiger vs lion all through history lion kills tiger. You can verify this just go to the library and pull up the microfish. Its been proven tiger fans hang on by eastern propaganda. The Romans have stated absolutely and proven that the Barbary lion took out all comers, lion or tiger. Henry the 8th also proved this when he retired his barbaries undefeated. While it was stated that eastern royalty was there to see their tiger win. No chance of trickery there. Watched as the lion dispatched the iger after running it down. Look at the gir forest as the asiatic lion chased down and killed the tiger. Tigers run in fear of the lion. If you still think the tiger would win eastern propaganda has fooled you. Back your cat westerners.
To Daniel Webster:
Another shameless liar. It was proven in Colosseum Rome that lions were defeated again and again.
Your intention is clear, you’re a narrow minded, and because you think lions are your cat.
Actually there are no lions in Europe any more. They are all gone in Europe. Whether you want to admit or not, your origination was in Africa, so are all living human being on the planet. All cats originated in Europe, 11 million years ago. All canines were from North America. Tigers started to emerge in Asia 5 to 6 million years ago. Back then your ancesters were still in Africa.
There is a clip called “The Big Cage” on youtube, a tigress vs. a Barbary lion. The shameless lion fans like Daniel Webster tried to make an impression that the lion won, but cutting the clip short, stating the lion ran the tigress down. But if you want the whole 3 min clips, the tigress clearly dominated the big lion. Hadn’t the people in the clip tried hard to rescue the lion from the tigress’ jaws, it would have been killed on the spot. Still, according to the director, the lion died of the injuries the next day. A precious barbary lion was lost.
On the contrary, there is no Oriental media that boost the image of tigers, or deliberately tarnish the image of lion There are only factual documentation, from Koreans, and a lot were from Western culture main stream media, BBC, NatGeo, Animal Planet. etc.
Clearly, sb like Daniel Webster is highly likely to be a racist, very possibly a White supremacist. If he backs lions due to their past origin Europe, wouldn’t he twist facts harder for his people, without acknowleging the merits of people of other races? Did Hilter refuse to award John Woodruff a gold medal after he won Olympic Gold in Munich Olympic 1936? Shame on you, Daniel Webster!
Note that tigers and Lions are not of the same race, but they are different animals in the same genus. It is the nature that builds tigers stronger, because tigers are solo hunters in order to survive, while lions are social group hunters. Being social makes up for their physical weakness, plus that is the only way for lion to survive in their habitats.
lol what an Idiot.
Tiger’s won in rome? Bullshit, the only occaision tiger’s had a victory was 1 stated by martial peter’s 1 time not everytime dumbass, go read the book…
–
The Memoirs of Cleopatra
“They took on tigers, bulls, and wild boars. Usually the lion won. page 284
–
Or the the book Antinous; a Romance of Ancient Rome which say’s…
The amphitheatre had grown so still, that the clear melody of the flute was distinctly audible over the whole vast space. As soon as the disturbance ceased, the king of the beast, apparently untroubled by the new visitor, returned to his food. But the cowardice, peculiar to nocturnal beasts in the daylight, awoke in the tiger. He beheld in the shrieking multitude friends of the flute-player, and seeing the lion eating, seized the nearest piece of meat. But with a single bound the lion sprang forward, roaring loudly, to defend his property. The tiger’s claws clutched the lion’s and a fierce struggle began. The lion aimed terrible blows at his antagonist, which the tiger avoided with marvelous skill; the tiger’s teeth seized the lion’s mane, but at the same instant the latter tore off with his claws from the upper part of the tiger’s head half the skin, from which an eat and a broad trail of blood upon the sand, the tiger returned to his cage, where he howled piteously. The grating was raised, and soon only a faint whining was audible. Either the animal was dying, or the keepers had stupefied him to be able to cure him. The lion stood fiercely over his prey, which no one now disputed.”
–
Or the book…
~Ken Spiro; WorldPerfect a jewish crash course…which say’s
“Next, the arena was lowered to feature combat between them as lions tore apart tigers, an went up against bears, croc’s leopards against wolves. It goes without saying that the Romans had never heard of animal rights.”
–
“Another subspecies very closely related to the Asian lion – the Barbary lion or Panthera leo leo – became extinct in the wild in 1922 (in Morocco). This animal the Barbary lion had been the dominant animal in the blood sports of the Roman arenas.”
~Martin Seyer’s dissertation (synopsis), Vienna University.
–
Tiger territory, AKA lairweb .com has stated tiger’s were reluctant to enter combat as much as lion’s greeted foe’s in the arena, also proven in same concept of everland’s video’s how male lion’s show high agression at time’s an drive off tiger’s proclaiming there natrual dominant trait’s.
–
Bill your pathetic, lying to other’s because your a Bia’s chump. lol
THE BIG CATS MAY BE FIERCE, AND POWERFUL, HOWEVER SOME OF THESE BROWN BEAR POWERFUL FIERCE AND FEAR NOTHING, WITH THERE STRENGHT BEHING THERE SWIPE I AM MOST CERTAIN THE BEAR WOULD KILL ALL THE CATS DUE TO SIZE AND BRUTE STRENGH!!
Casey, bear’s only average 400-600 pound’s the weight’s of the so call 1,500 pounder’s were only estimate’s in the past. Shown actual weight’s of one of the biggest bear’s that was weighed by a zoologist was only 1,200 pound’s an he was so obese he couldent even jog let alone defend him self.
–
Lion’s have ou gamed bear’s in the past already, they have matc-able stregth an more gameness, like pitbull’s is to larger dog’s, they bring Game an willpower that has shown to be the better factor in fighting, look at Bruce lee he literly broke a man 2x his size in half with the experince of his own fighting technique’s, the same way these lion’s managed to kill bigger Grizly an Polar bear’s here…
1.1902 lion named roosevlet killed peary the polar bear.
Lion kills Polar bear…
http://lh3.ggpht.com/-CIWrL1-cEGk/T6YitbFpChI/AAAAAAAAANg/8KRGCnZZgKE/le%25C3%25B3n%2520vs%2520oso%2520blanco.j%20pg
And another…
–
2.John heliot’s circus lion named brutus kills polar bear.
Lion kill’s Polar bear…
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c172/ScottBanks/lionkillspolarbear.jpg
And another…
3. lion kills polar bear 1955 By Alfred Court.[Book]Pages 131-132,
Lion kills Polar bear
http://www.worthpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Life-With-Big-Cats.jpg
Here’s more
–
4. lion kills polar bear Louis Roth, forty years with jungle killers, [Book]
page 204-205.
Lion kills Polar bear
http://www.worthpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Louis-Roth.jpg
And more…
5.1893 Pezon in limoges, Leo the lion maul’s polar bear
–
lion Kill’s polar bear…
http://lh5.ggpht.com/-9W0zfcHzAHs/T6Z52mThgGI/AAAAAAAAAOY/ryc0taAxzgY/POLAR%2520BEAR%2520VS%2520LION%2520DREADF%20UL%2520DUEL.jpg
Now here’s account’s of lion’s killing adult male Grizzley Bear’s 1 on 1…
–
6.Boltimore the lion kills russian grizzley
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg265/scaled.php?server=265&filename=sdffti0.jpg&res=landing
An here’s another lion that killed a full grown grizzley bear 1 on 1…
–
7. Lion kills Grizzly bear…
http://www.pictures-of-cats.org/images/lion-vs-bear.gif
8.lion strangle’s an kills 1 out of 7 bears
9. Lioness kills atlas bear in the roman arena
10. my personal favorite, that should end an wrap up this site’s disccusion on who’s the better fighter an killer out of all 3…A Lion killed a Tiger and Bear in the exact same fight without prep time, and the lion killed the bear faster than he killed the tiger, here…
Lion kills bear and tiger
http://i277.photobucket.com/albums/kk45/brentlion_2008/brentonlion/books_003-25.png
You see Casey ^^^…???
–
Lion’s have killed tiger’s an bear’s more than the other way around as shown in the above post^^^. there’s ton’s more account’s an very little of the oposite.
Chuck Norris would win in a fight between a lion, tiger and bear.