On blogging professionally
Professional blogging (which I’ve been doing for over a year now) has a lot in common with traditional journalism. While I don’t consider myself a conventional journalist, I do follow proven methodologies without having my articles edited prior to publishing (you know, spelling, integrity, neutrality, etc). As a blogger, I’m asked to never take anything at face value, find the best angle in a story, add new context to a subject, open a topic up for discussion, and critique PR fluff for the consumer’s benefit. I really enjoy the work and hope to do it full-time someday.
Lately, however, I’ve been feeling a little cynical because of all the scrutiny I perform. Sometimes I feel like just being a consumer once in a while, but that consumer emotion is at odds with the service I try to render for my readers. I guess this post probably exposes the feelings of a newbie reporter after being involved in the space for an extended period of time. I just want to be more optimistic.
This is one reason why when I was considering journalism I ultimately decided against it. I was working for a paper and I loved it, but the natural tendency of the atmosphere was to scrutinize things, and that often led to negativity among the people and their personalities.
Juicy stories were better than fluffy stories when it came to what people wanted to read, and juicy usually had some sort of dirt attached to it. Look at Bill Gephardt. His entire job revolves around finding the bad in things so he can tell people about it and how he helped. Still though, he finds the bad first.