Professional yet playful communication
I’ve had an epiphany of sorts in the way I interact and communicate with several of my business prospects and clients since the beginning of this year: Spicing things up a bit while remaining professional can really make a difference in how people respond. It’s what I call professional yet playful communication (PP communication for short).
To give you an idea, here is how I responded to a prospective (now current) client last month regarding some project management concerns of his: “I’m am a project management ninja!” Cocky? A little. But I’ve built my business atop a well-thought out project management process, so a word like “ninja” sounds so much better, more enjoyable, and less dull then some overused and tired business cliche not worth repeating.
Take a look at the phase names of another site we’re developing:
- Phase I – A New Hope
- Phase II – The Twinkie Strikes Back
- Phase III – Return of the Investment
Silly? Maybe. But it’s made the work more enjoyable for all involved, and it gets results. Granted, I may not land every deal while using such a juvenile word like ninja, but a majority have no option but to take notice and more often than not appreciate the comedic differentiation, however off-the-wall.
This isn’t to say I avoid a more conventional approach when a prospect warrants it, but even then I try to be candid and personable as possible. So do you mix things up in your professional communication, or is it all business?
4 Comments
Yeah, gratuitous, cutesie comments aren’t for me. I’m hard-nosed about business and if cute language were used like you’re using, I’d probably not do business with that person or entity.
Also, “I’m a project management ninja!” is a statement about *you*, not about the customer or his/her concerns. What your client was looking for was a certain level of comfort that you will not screw up the engagement. The client wants reassurance that his/her project will be done well, within budget, and on time. The ninja response above just doesn’t address the *real* concern. But, it does speak volumes about what your focus is.
A more appropriate response would be to (1) really listen to what your client is saying (non-verbal cues here) and (2) address the concern in a way that doesn’t trivialize the client’s concern.
“Yeah, gratuitous, cutesie comments aren’t for me. I’m hard-nosed about business.”
Fair enough. There’s never one way of doing business.
“If cute language were used like you’re using, I’d probably not do business with that person or entity.”
Ah, Pete! But you sent me a great referral, and by reading this very blog aren’t you doing business with me in a way?
“What your client was looking for was a certain level of comfort that you will not screw up the engagement.”
Right. For context, I didn’t share the entire client dialog for obvious reasons. Just proving a point.
“Ah, Pete! But you sent me a great referral, and by reading this very blog aren’t you doing business with me in a way?”
Regarding the former, YES, you’re welcome. I very happy to help you; I want good, Utah companies to succeed. You’re welcome.
Regarding the latter, Business — ummm, no. There’s no exchange of goods or services; as far as I’m concerned, we’re just talking — a dialogue, that’s all. No business — at worse, we’re talking; at best, we’re networking. But, business, no. Are you in a business relationship will all your commenters?
No big deal; not causing a fight, just starting a dialogue.
I think mixing things up is great. When it comes right down to it, who really wants such a serious business environment, anyway?
I try to let my personality shine through at work, but it’s really, really difficult for me because I still feel so young and inexperienced. 🙁