How Digg.com is democratizing the news
What do you get when you mix Slashdot community ratings with MySpace social networking and Delicious tags to let users categorize stories? You get Digg.com, the company I believe is revolutionizing relevant search and turning the news into a democracy. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again, search engine optimization, machine algorithms, and search engine bots are on the way out. Though it may be several years, people engines via the social web will be the future of search relevancy. Don’t get me wrong, I think indexing will still be used, but human relevancy is far superior.
From the article: “Imagine being able, for example, to use Digg to explore the popularity of consumer products such as cell phones or plasma TVs–to be able, as Rose put it, “to drill down among your set of friends or the masses and see their opinions.” Then imagine this capacity married to the recommendation-engine feature that Rose and his team are working on. In other words, Consumer Reports, look out.”
3 Comments
I’d be interested to hear more explanation for your prediction that “search is on the way out”, because I’m not seeing it yet. SEO tactics come and go, sure, and as search engine algorithms get better, things like keyword density and meta tags will matter less and less.
But search engines are good for the REALLY long tail, like finding answers to error messages or finding all the instances of your name on the Web, times when you know what you’re looking for. Social networks, on the other hand, are really good when you don’t know what you’re looking for, but you want something interesting.
Actually Google was the first search engine with a “social” algorithm, i.e. give the highest rank to the page that most people link to. I think the genius in it was that it didn’t require people to do anything different. (They were already linking.) Social networks require more work, so there isn’t a natural incentive to participate.
Granted, Digg makes it extremely easy to submit and vote on articles.
Blake:
I 90% agree with you. I think that a highbread of Digg+Squidoo+del.icio.us=a great new option.
Ryan
I have to disagree partly. I think search engines will always be here. They serve a very specific purpose in that they provide 1) almost limitless scope (all the websites on the web) and 2) almost limitless specificity (anything you want to search on not just something popular with others).
The main problem with Digg is that it has a very specific scope, tech news. Of course, that specific scope has led to its success. I think Digg is going to lead to the rise of consensus filter sites (I saw that term somewhere else), but it won’t replace search.
Sure SEO should be on the way out, but it will be replaced with Content Optimization. Instead of optimizing for search engines, people will look at their content and optimize it for all situations. That’s something everyone should do anyway.
One area, I think has been grossly overlooked on the web is browsing which consensus sites help to a certain degree. Searching is great when you are looking for something specific, but browsing is better when you have only a general idea of what you want.
Of course, the rise of tagging is an attempt to fill the browsing void.