Try as they may, PR no longer control the conversation. You do.
This post comes courtesy of a good friend — Nicholas Roussos — as he so concisely describes and interesting event that transpired in public relations yesterday. First a little background. Sony’s newly launched PlayStation 3 is in a world of hurt. It costs a whopping $600 (Blu-ray included) and people aren’t buying it. The value proposition just isn’t there yet (if ever) on a mass scale. Note: PlayStation brings in 60% of Sony’s total profits.
So yesterday, the world’s largest gaming blog, Kotaku, leaked information that Sony would be releasing a new social networking tool heavily inspired by Nintendo’s and Microsoft’s already existing user-generated content efforts. Sony asks them not to run the story, but Kotaku rightfully does anyway.
About an hour later, Sony blackballs Kotaku from all company relations saying only information in the “public domain” will be made available to Kotaku in their coverage of Sony products. Kotaku publishes Sony’s archaic email ban and fittingly describes the biggest conflict of interest between PR and journalism in a respectful reply to Sony’s head of PR, Dave Karraker: “I think [your reaction] only highlights the differences that PR people and journalists have. My interest is not in making sure that Sony has positive news or that the timing of their news is correct, my job only is to inform the readers of news as quickly and accurately as I can.”
Immediately after Kotaku’s follow up post to their rumor, the internet implodes. Every single gaming blog is quick to criticize Sony’s reaction. The story reaches Digg’s homepage, and Sony’s already negative relationship with consumers spirals even further out of control, all in a matter of hours. Sony quickly caves, and reinvites Kotaku to all of their events, etc. Everything like it was before only Sony leaving having learned a valuable lesson. That is the online conversation changes everything, as Nic states “Cluetrain-style.” The above example shows Sony PR trying to do what traditional PR does; control the message and its timing. Kotaku makes that effort to control public and fosters more leverage against the mighty Sony corporation than it ever could alone. The online conversation is so powerful that even a company as big as Sony has to give in.
3 Comments
Great point, Russ. Sadly (as you know), PR strategy goes far beyond those merely implementing and/or recommending it.
heck yes it does . . .
The sad part is that Sony did anything at all. They should have just said “we don’t comment on rumors” and left it at that.
This whole thing could have turned out really good for them if they would have left it at that.
Leaking information has its merits. It happens all the time. I’m willing to bet that it’s rare that “leaked” information isn’t actually part of the PR strategy.
If you leak it people start talking about it long before the product comes out, and the news dies after a while because it’s just speculation. But it creates interest. It’s one of the oldest PR tactics in the book.
Where PR people fail is that they can control the flow of information a lot of times, but as you said, Sony tries to control the conversation. The onl effective way to “control” the conversation is to manage the information.
I read the Kotaku stuff, and it sounds to me like the PR guy was being told to do this from someone over him.
Most PR people at that level aren’t stupid enough to pull antics like this, but executives that give them direction are often that stupid.