Print magazines: Are you buying this damage control?
As seen in this month’s issue of Wired.
My thoughts: Agreed that information technology isn’t always replaced by newer technology (i.e. pens, pencils, paperbacks). But to suggest that printed magazines are actually thriving is a bit of stretch. My guess is the quoted “11 percent growth” stems from that fuzzy “pass along” metric magazines still use to measure audience size. (And to suggest that magazines are the superior way of reading essays is also wrong.)
Either way, stop hard-selling yourself, magazines. We know what you’re good for: Bathrooms, waiting lobbies, and other offline environments.
2 Comments
I was excited that I could start to subscribe to magazines on my iPad but then I realized I don’t want to bring it into the bathroom.
P.S. Magazines are still awesome. Proof: National Geographic
Then again, Rolling Stone sucks royal nowadays.
Paperback’s probably a bad example. The growth of ebooks in just the last year has been astounding. I’m sure there will be a limited market for paperbacks for the next 100 years. However, iIn the next 10 years, I foresee a shift with printed books becoming relegated to a role of something like a fountain pen. Yes, you can find one if you want, but they’re definitely not mainstream.